I recently saw a comment chain about nuclear bombs, and that led me to thinking about this. Say there is a nuclear explosion in the downtown of my US city. I survive relatively fine, but obviously the main part of the city has been destroyed, while major zones extending from the center were also badly damaged. What would be a good response to (a) survive and (b) help out the recovery effort?

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      111 month ago

      I live at the edge of a city but near a major airport. my biggest nuke fear is a bomb hits the city center that leaves me alive and the airport ones take awhile to arrive.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        Is there even any nukeing the airport? Damage to the runway plus the EMP generated would probably prevent aircraft from taking off.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I just assumed they would want to hit major infrastructure like airports, depots and such. Now my new fear is they don’t nuke the airport at all. Im like at 3rd degree awefulness distance.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        I used to live about three miles from Camp David. I figured I’d either be killed immediately or inside a defensive perimeter in the event of a war.

      • Large bridges, airports, urban areas, any military installations, dams/hydroelectric, power plants, major train hubs, etc. are all targets in all-out nuclear war. You’ll need to actually think of how many things are targets and plot what not to be near.

        Either way, all-out war would fuck the planet and probably set us back a century at best. If China survived they’d be the global power as they have the resources and manufacturing that the rest of the world has mostly given up, the rest would be completely decimated.

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    571 month ago

    Assuming your home isn’t on fire. Seal everything, do not go outside! If possible, stay inside for as long as possible. Fill everything with water your bathtub, every cup, bucket, etc. Monitor the radio for emergency broadcasts for what to do next. AM stations are more likely to work. If you have a CB radio handy, (depending on your country) you can talk to authorities on Channel 9.

    • @neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Tip regarding radio: 2182kHz SSB near the coast. That frequency is monitored by authorities globally. It’s the MF equivalent of maritime VHF ch16.

      Technically, the same goes for 2187.5kHz, but that’s for digital transmission only, and unless you have the required hardware to encode/decode it, you won’t be able to make sense of it.

      Source: I have a GOC

      • @RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        CB radio has really short range and there’s little likelihood that authorities would be monitoring it.

        2182 kHz is long range marine radio and only good if you’re on a boat. I don’t know that anyone you talk to would care about a person on land while they’re handling their own maritime emergencies.

        If someone really wants emergency radio I’d suggest ham radio or GMRS.

    • @litchralee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There is also amateur radio (aka ham radio), which can legally and practically operate at higher output powers if necessary, and on far more frequencies than CB. Although doomsday people often say to just buy a ham radio and use it without a license, I don’t advise that, simply because having the radio is only half the challenge.

      The other half is the ability to competently operate the radio to effectively communicate and organize aid. And this only comes with practice by talking to others, in the form of regular participation in radio nets and/or emcomm activities. Emergency radio isn’t even limited to voice transmissions, with digital modes and even fax modes being an option that can transmit quicker and farther. Having a legit call sign will make it easier for rescuers to identify your transmissions, as well as figuring out if you’ve been located.

      While some people will make ham radio a lifelong hobby, others obtain their license simply for small-talk, or for a SHTF scenario, or as longer-distance walkie-talkies when camping in heavily wooded forests. The possibilities are endless, but it all starts with a first radio and some basic training on radio handling.

      Ham radio clubs across the USA and the world are generally very welcoming of new folks, so it’s worth looking up your nearby club or dropping in on an in-person club meeting.

    • @Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The CB radio thing is going to be very location specific, I work in 911 dispatch, I think the state police around me theoretically monitor channel 9 on the highways, but in practice I wouldn’t have a lot of confidence in that, they barely look at info we send them over the computer, CB also has a somewhat limited range, so you’re counting on them having an officer somewhat nearby or you being close to their station.

      As for local police, around me I suspect a few of them probably still have a CB antenna on the roof of their station and maybe even an old radio stashed somewhere in a closet but not hooked up and not being monitored, and the officers definitely don’t have them in their vehicles.

      I’m in a pretty dense suburban area outside of a major city, they might still get some use in more rural areas where cell signals aren’t as reliable, though you’re probably going to run into the same issues with range limitations, in normal ideal conditions, you might get a range of about 20 miles or so, depending on atmospheric conditions, geography, etc. you might get only a fraction of that.

      EDIT: FWIW, I keep a CB in my car, decent amount of chatter still happens on 19 around me, and a few other channels, and somehow channel 9 seems to have become essentially the Spanish language channel.

      • tiredofsametab
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Generally, the worst intensity stuff is actually over in the first 48-72 hours depending upon various factors. That’s not to say outside is completely safe after that (it wouldn’t be), but the level of danger is very different.

  • @CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 month ago

    Great questions, and you need to familiarize yourself with the correct answers. Generally memorize the protocols. I’m going to regurgitate what I have internalized & point you to online resources to educate yourself further.

    Preparations made well in advance really give an advantage to survival.

    As soon as a nuke is dropped, go the fuck home. Turn on your faucets & fill all sinks & bathtubs, as this may be the last of your easy, clean, potable water you’ll get from the grid for who knows how long.

    One of the biggest & best things you can do is shelter in place, I think for a week. Radioactive fallout & the heavy alpha particles will be everywhere, and blow everywhere. Cover all windows & doors with Visqueen sheeting & duct tape, control & eliminate the travel of random-ass particulates. After 1 week, the radioactive potency of the dust particles should be reduced by 85-90%. That’s huge. So shut your windows & doors, seal everything up, and sit your ass down. It could save your life.

    Shelter in place requires food, water, preps. I think it’s overkill, but overkill is also kind of what you need/want, 1 gallon of water per person per day. When Russia started getting on their shit, people were buying up iodine tabs. This harmless substance negates the harmful effects of potential radioactive exposure via your food & drink. The trick is you have to take this stuff a set amount of time…before…exposure to radioactive particles. It protects your thyroid gland, IIRC. Have water, have food, maybe have a container or two of those fancy tablets.

    Especially in the earlier days, you help others by being able to help yourself. If there are assistance efforts, you can turn them down & the help can go to others in more dire need.

    We can, and do, talk about prepping things for years on end. I would recommend you tune in to Canadian Prepper (hey,I watched some of the video after & I didn’t do too badly!)

    Yes, Canadian Prepper touches on this. In my words: information is good. But the authorities, and other people, may lie or not tell the entire truth. They tell you what they want you to know. Good advice in general.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      But the authorities, and other people, may lie or not tell the entire truth. They tell you what they want you to know.

      You’d think that lesson would still be fresh from the pandemic, when at the very beginning the CDC tried to get the public not to hoard masks so the actual medical professionals could have them, then that got twisted and metastisized into “masks don’t work” and the ant-masker/anti-vaxxer bullshit.

      • @cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        The frustrating thing is that masks don’t protect you particularly well. What they do is protect others from any infection you are carrying. This is why it was more important to provide them to those interacting with infected or vulnerable people. It limited the risk of spreading it further.

      • @Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        I think the aspect of “hoarding” itself is the culprit here. Yes Karen, you can take 4 masks for you and your 3 kids. No karen, you don’t need 28 for every day of the week.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Probably a stupid question, but during that week, going outside to fire up my whole house generator would probably be a death sentence. Right? So I should just live without electricity for a week? That reality has me thinking that I need to get one of those generators that turns itself on when power goes out. It would be really convenient during the winter anyways, since we lose power a lot when it snows around here.

      • @DeLacue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Yes going outside in the first week is a very bad idea. However not because the radiation outside will instantly drop you. Much of the radiation will be coming from radioactive dust, known as fallout that’ll be comprised of all kinds of isotopes. The isotopes that decay quickly release a lot of radiation over a short period and if you go outside you will come back covered in them. This will bring radiation into wherever you are using as your shelter. This would not just harm the person who went outside but everyone else sheltering with them. So do not go outside for any reason. You can make do without power for a while.

        On a related note; keep water and food covered. Skin is a surprisingly good defense against radiation but breathing in this dust or letting it get into the food you eat or the water you drink is very dangerous. After a week has passed you should for your own safety keep the time spent outside your shelter as low as possible. Short trips outside will become safer as time goes on but activities that kick up dust will still be dangerous for a long time.

  • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This brings to mind something David Mitchell said once on Would I Lie To You (British panel show):

    In response to Kelvin MacKenzie’s claim that the “This Is My” guest had built him a nuclear bunker:

    David Mitchell: If there’s a nuclear war, I don’t want to live. I don’t want to come out of a shelter and try to rebuild society. I have no skills. Okay, society is destroyed by a nuclear war, we’re basically - we’re back to the bronze age…how long is it gonna be before people start pitching panel shows again? It’s gonna be at least 2000 years!

    Watch it here if you want, it was annoyingly hard to find.

    However I don’t think David - who is a comedian - is precisely right about how such a war would affect the state of technology. If there are survivors, I don’t think we’d really be back to the bronze age. Even if all technology was destroyed (which it wouldn’t be), give humans a few decades, we’ll have some sort of modern technology back up and running. Maybe not computers, but some certainly some analogue electronics - the knowledge isn’t lost. Communications would be one of the first points of focus, so television would follow closely behind.

    • peopleproblems
      link
      fedilink
      151 month ago

      The longest stretch would likely be chip fabs. You need precision electronics and hazardous chemicals and plenty of power.

      But considering that some form of electronics will survive, and it wouldnt take long for people to get rudimentary electricity going, I don’t see why we couldn’t have world Internet within a decade.

      • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Yeah, chip fabs are exactly why I think computers would need more time. I’m not super familiar with this, but I’d wager such a factory can only be built using tools and machines that come from other specialized factories, and so on maybe 3 levels down before you get to a relatively rudimentary manufacturing process that can be reasonably achieved within a few years. It would take a lot to get that back up and running.

        • Zoot
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          However… Just think about how many chips are currently just sitting around… Between scrapping and searching you would likely be just fine for a few decades.

            • Zoot
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              Only if they were currently running, and I’m willing to guess the vast majority of reusable/scrap chips will be unpowered in the event of an EMP.

              Replacing all working electronics with new boards would definitely be a task. But unless we get an massive flare from the sun I hardly think that’ll be an issue.

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          By the time nuclear war happens, most chip manufacturing capability will be underground or in hidden sites and therefore not targeted.

          • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            How could you be sure of any of that? For all we know, nuclear war could start tomorrow. Or, a bit more realistically, next year. How fast can these factories be built?

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      Counterpoint:

      A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

      -Robert A. Heinlein

    • @dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      The thing is, people inherently want to live. It’s instinctual. Secondly, everybody - regardless of skill level - can learn to be handy and useful. If everything is destroyed, and society is to be rebuilt, a lot of manual labor will be needed for cleanup and rebuilding. Even the “I pick things up and put them down” guy is perfectly suited for this type of work.

    • volvoxvsmarla
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      Thank you for the clip! I once found the show on youtube by accident, it is such a gem. It all started with the cabbage feud. (But I have come to notice that James Acaster only tells true stories, alas.)

      I absolutely don’t get the point system though but nevermind.

      • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        I never tried to keep track, but I always assumed each correctly identified lie/truth gets a point, and each mistake gives a point to the other team. Keep in mind that the show gets edited down and you don’t see everything that the audience did, while the score probably includes those things you didn’t see.

        But like, absolutely no one watches this show for the score, so who cares? It might as well be QI’s scoring system :)

  • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 month ago

    No time like the present to get involved with something like a Community Emergency Response Team or its local equivalent. FEMA has manuals and other training materials available online which address the matter of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE; sometimes just CBRN or NBC depending on agency or publication date) incidents. Won’t make you an expert on yield estimation or fallout mapping but there is information which may be useful for improving individual and community resilience.

    Personally, I think the likelihood of getting nuked is low and it’s much more likely that a CERT volunteer will be called upon to assist in natural disasters or major accidents to relieve the burden on professional crews. Where I live, teams have been employed to assist in redirecting traffic around areas with downed power lines or, in one case somewhat recently, a significant natural gas leak. Firefighters and other specialists establish a safe perimeter before handing off the site to volunteers so they can respond to other incidents throughout the city while repair crews work down their list of priorities.

    Long comment short: building useful skills and relationships before shit meets fan means less scrambling to figure it out on that day and there are real, practical applications for that knowledge beyond LARPing with Jim-Bob’s moron militia.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If a blast happens in your city and you live…it’s probably best to just suicide rather then deal with the literal fallout and radiation poisoning.

    In Short, you will not survive…go painless

    • @Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      That was my first thought too, but i don’t know enough about blast radius to make a good decision. Are we talking 50 miles, 500 miles, …? Will it knock out a city, a state, or the country?

      • teft
        link
        fedilink
        121 month ago

        Depends on the yield of the bomb but if we use the current yield of chinese ICBMs and detonated it above NYC much of Long Island would be just erased and the rest would be leveled. Manhattan would probably just be a flat smoking wasteland.

        https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

        • @deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          On your map most of Long Island is unaffected. It’s 12km moderate blast damage (5 psi) from the Chinese nuke. Long Island goes way off to the east. It’s 190km long.

          Tsar bomba is a different story though.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            That map doesn’t look like it touch on the fallout at all, just the damage from the explosion.

            Depending on how efficient the bomb is, and the direction of the winds, highly radioactive unspent fissile material will travel for miles. This stuff will shave decades off your life.

            • volvoxvsmarla
              link
              fedilink
              61 month ago

              I checked the website out yesterday. You can either have the fallout shown or not. It also depends on whether you choose to detonate in the air or on the surface. But if you choose the option with the fallout, boy,… honestly maybe don’t because it was legit more depressing and scary than what you see in the screenshot above.

              • partial_accumen
                link
                fedilink
                41 month ago

                This is one of the fascinating things I learned about all the nuclear testing the USA was doing in the 70s 80s and 90s. They weren’t trying to make bigger bombs (that was 50s and 60s) it was making the same nuclear material in the bomb more completely used. The more of the material use, the less fallout.

                For reference, the Hiroshima bomb used less than 2% of its fuel. Of its 64kg of uranium, only about 1kg actually split. The rest of the highly radioactive Uranium was just spread around by the explosion as fallout.

          • teft
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s 190km long.

            Goddamn. I was thinking 50-75km tops.

    • @wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 month ago

      …unless the brain doesn’t die as fast as we believe, and so you become ‘paralyzed’ in a sense, beyond revival but still very aware of your predicament for some time. They do call it ‘practicing’ medicine, and nobody has been able to un-die and tell us what the actual process is.

      Imagine it being like sleep paralysis, until you decompose. Decaying in a buried box is the ‘good’ way.

      Things to think about.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    141 month ago

    Attention all Fallout gamers!

    BackOnMyBS is in trouble and they need your help to survive a nuclear explosion in their city. To do this, they need a Vault and a trusty canteen. To help them, all they need is your credit card number, the three numbers on the back and the expiration month and year. But you gotta be quick so that BackOnMyBS can build a Vault and survive nuclear annihilation!

  • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    131 month ago

    Make sure my PC is ok and all GOG games downloaded. If needed, transfer the battlestation to a safer or better location, with a generator/solar panels & a decent battery.

    Profit.
    My life won’t change, I just won’t go to work.

  • @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    111 month ago

    if you’re gonna die in nuclear strike, it’ll be most likely because a building you’re in collapses. unless you’re very close to a target that might get a ground burst or small nuke, like airport, large transit node like cargo railroad terminal, high level military command hq or such, you shouldn’t worry too hard about radiation either. in any other case, if you’re within fatal radiation dose range, then you’re also deep within overpressure-that-will-collapse-any-building range and instant-third-degree-burn-and-beyond range. at smaller yields you’ll see fireball range greater than fatal radiation range. play around with https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/ to get the idea

    if you’re outside, you’ll get thermal burns and might be thrown around but as long as nothing falls on you, and ignoring burns, you should be mostly fine. there won’t be utilities, no power, no water, no communications, so you better have some batteries. if you have shelter, then if you have water and food to weather it out, and if you’re upwind of groundbursts if any, then you’ll probably survive

    …long enough to be drafted, because in space of day we went from peace to total war

  • @someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The first rule in rescue is don’t become another casualty.

    Hunker down for a few days, iirc the most dangerous radiation will decay in the first few days. You don’t want the ash on your body. Fill your bathtub/whatever else with water to drink and ration your food.

  • @LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Everybody is acting like its the apocalypse, just put on one off those N95 masks we all have from covid, get in your car and fuck off. Or walk, you can easily cover 30 km in a few hours to the next not destroyed city.

    Edit: I meant kilometers.

        • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          Oh…yeah, I guess thats true. I was thinking you meant like 30 miles in 2-3 hours, which I won’t say is as fast as the flash…but maybe the flash’s infant baby?

          Although, with me personally, I’d be like “uuuuggghhhhhh how long is this walking going to beeeee???”

          And someone would say “we’ve been walking 45 minutes…so, maybe another 5 hours?”

          “Ya know what? You guys go ahead without me. I’m just going to lay in the road and wait for the next bomb”

          Pssshhhh!!! Walking…

    • Beacon
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A very fit athletic person who has done endurance training can do 30 miles in a day, but that’s not typical. Most people could do around 10+ if their life literally depended on it like in the aftermath of a nuke

      Source: a brief web search

    • CALIGVLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      People in this thread are playing way too much Fallout lol.