“While damage assessment is still occurring, it is confirmed as a direct hit,” a Ukrainian military source tells Sky News.

A Ukrainian warplane has for the first time fired a weapon that struck a target inside Russia, a Ukrainian military source has told Sky News.

The source said a “Russian command node” was hit on Sunday in the area of Belgorod, western Russia.

Belgorod is close to the border with northeastern Ukraine.

It was not immediately clear what type of munition was used in the attack, including whether or not it had been a Western weapon.

        • Anarch157a@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Which means Russia has to move assets from other parts of the country to replace the destroyed equipment, creating gaps Ukraine can exploit, This reinforces the idea of how fragile Russia’s defenses are

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Drones have been making their way 5-600 miles inside Russia to numerous air bases and oil refineries. It’s remarkable that they can do this without getting shot down.

          Even where the systems still exist, they just don’t seem to be active / effective.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was not immediately clear what type of munition was used in the attack, including whether or not it had been a Western weapon.

    This is the perfect example of reporting before the fog of war has cleared. Whether or not it was a Western weapon would have been useful information if they had just waited for either clarification or to be told there would be no clarification.

    • Null User Object@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s absolutely nothing wrong with reporting the facts that you do have when you have them and are confident of your sources.

      Acknowledging remaining open questions that you don’t have answers to yet, is a bonus.

      A perfect example of reporting before the fog of war clears would be reporting completely erroneous information as factual. So unless you’re suggesting that a Ukrainian fighter jet did NOT in fact strike a target inside Russia, then this isn’t the “perfect example” you’re looking for.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly I find that information irrelevant and that section could have been removed entirely. The actual point of the story was that a Ukrainian fighter jet attacked a target inside Russia.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ukrainians have developed their own JDAM-ER analogue, AASM is also a possibility. Belgorod is close enough to border to be in range

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Jdam er and aasm primarily use gps for targeting. And have been rendered pretty much useless under Russias constant gps jamming. But if there was a window I bet they’ll use anything they can.