• archiduc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 days ago

    In case you missed the markings on it, it’s also free and runs on electricity, which in France is low carbon.

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wonder how much of the length cutting was just from being able to remove the ICE and all its associated components.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And the distinction is pointless. It’s a bus. It is. It simply is a bus. Some kind of bus.

        Bus.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It’s still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Dude, it’s not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It’s a shuttle because IT’S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 days ago

    No medieval city claims that. Hell, they are more walkable and transit oriented than more modern cities that were designed for cars. Stop with the straw men.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      No medieval city claims that.

      Its a common enough argument in the UK. I’ve even seen a few instances in which bus stops have been taken down because people were complaining about the traffic they created (small street with no passing lane, so when the bus stops, the dozen cars behind it are bottled up).

      None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

      • daltotron@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

        I feel like I perhaps know who may be driving those cars

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Saying they don’t like the location of a bus stop is not saying you can’t have busses.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s also not true. Don’t know any towns in the UK that don’t have buses and use small streets as an excuse.

          Most of the towns in the UK that don’t have buses use lack of funding from central government as an excuse, which is a pretty good excuse.

  • wieson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not the medieval cities that fight tooth and nail to prevent public transit.

  • Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here in my town, they simply have a refurbished van with like 12 seats hauling people around.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve seen those. In the suburbs here they often have call-ahead pickup to specific locations, like the only remaining mall or the library.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you don’t have room for busses now, when will you have room for all the parking required for everyone to drive a car around all the time?

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Similar in size to the bus I used to take to work every day when I lived in Japan. I miss being able to wake up thirty minutes before I had to be there and still making it on time.

    • glaber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      My hometown has very similar ones and they can hold up to 25 people adding up seating and standing space, don’t underestimate them

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      They don’t need to sit that many. It’s not an interstate route that runs thrice a day and carries 300 people in each run. For it to be an alternative to cars you need to have lots of route and they need to be quite frequent - which means less people in each minibus.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The ones I used to take ran every ten minutes and we would pack thirty to forty people on for each trip during rush hour. They really needed to bump it to one bus every five minutes from about 6am to 8am if only for safety reasons, but even packing them to standing capacity like we did I never worried that I wouldn’t be able to get on and get to work in the morning.