Summary

White supremacist Avi Rachlin used racist slurs during a Michigan Senate committee hearing, claiming proposed gun legislation unfairly targets white people while suggesting lawmakers focus on Black communities in Detroit.

Representing the extremist group “Groypers for America,” Rachlin falsely argued the bill was retaliation against white Trump supporters.

His comments, including the use of the N-word, were condemned by lawmakers, with Sen. Jim Runestad calling the remarks inappropriate.

The committee ultimately advanced the bill, which would expand the ban on firearms in Michigan’s Capitol, initially requested after armed protests in 2020.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    what a racist goblin.

    dude exudes small penis energy.

    the legislation should put forward a new bill that actually targets racist gun owners just to prove a point.

    sometimes the smallest “chuck” at the bar has the loudest mouth and needs a reality check.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s amazing how frequently white supremacists take the ahistorical route to justify their beliefs.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      easiest way to implement gun control, arm black people en masse and make sure to advertise it

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        happened when the Panthers started showing up armed (legally) to protests.

        happened when someone started to threaten congress with their own dirty movie rentals in DC.

        It’s almost like management won’t do anything until you make it their problem.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        There was an episode of Bojack Horseman titled Thoughts and Prayers in which during a rise in mass gun violence, the Government is debating gun control. It doesn’t appear to be going anywhere until (following some sub-plotlines) there’s a huge surge in women owning handguns for self-protection and empowerment. The govt then pretty quickly moves to ban all guns.

        Quote from the summary: “A senator asks what his constituents are supposed to do, not compliment random women on the street? and says they can’t live with that kind of fear.” and “Diane then says she can’t believe this country hates women more than it loves guns.”

        10/10 show

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Republicans tripped over each other to enact gun control when they saw organized and arm black people excersiding their right to bare arms.

          It feels like 70% of US laws and agencies were motivated by racism and oppression of minorities.

          • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Like all other Western countries the US were built on genocide and slavery, I wouldn’t be too keen on arming the oppressed either

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    Weird, because historically gun control happens when white people get scared a black man has the same rights as them.

    Just ask Dredd Scott v Sanford , or Ronald Reagan.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It is racial because the people who carry in the Capitol are primarily white people“

    Because the black ones are accosted and harassed if they’re armed? Something I heard a long time ago was that whites fear becoming a minority because they know how minorities are treated. I just find it odd that they use that as a reason to obsessively cling to power instead of trying to make everyone’s lives better.

    Back in 2020, Democratic lawmakers requested a change to firearm regulations in the Capitol when armed demonstrators and militia members went into the building demanding an end to COVID-19.

    Funny how gun laws and gun restrictions are okay when it comes to protecting lawmakers, but not okay when it comes to protecting schoolchildren.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    White person from MI here. I don’t want anyone to have easy access to guns, especially white people. And I don’t want them to be allowed where peaceful protests happen. Armed protestors are not protesting they are intimidating.

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I do wonder if there is some value in like a “protestor defense volunteer”. Like a group that their job is just to protect the people in protesting areas, regardless of affiliation or reason. Can’t call it a problem if everyone gets defended while exercising their rights, and then protestors don’t have a reason to bring guns.

      Edit: I guess that would normally just be the police?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, most of the time the protesting groups bring their own armed people. They don’t take part in the protests generally though. They stand to the side and watch (at least for leftists, I think the right they’re more directly part of it).

        Ideally the police is what you’re asking for, but I wouldn’t put much faith in them.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The police is the arm of the government, so they usually find a bullshit reason to dismiss a protest violently. Unless you are a white christofascist group, then have at it.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    His emderpened speech may have come off better if it white, and klan, folk weren’t the #1 source of terrorism for two decades.

    Is that the majority of gun deaths? No but good luck anyone caring after that talk.