Senate health committee chair Bernie Sanders has called a vote to subpoena the chief of Novo Nordisk’s U.S. division over the company’s pricing of Ozempic and Wegovy.
Not sure why you’re being downvoted so much, it’s an interesting point. If you make it too cheap and it has a lot of side effects, you are t really saving anyone money. You’re not even improving their health in the long run.
That being said, I have no idea how bad the long term effects are.
Except it does seem rather odd to keep a medicine from people whose lives it could save (obesity causes a lot more problems than diabetes), because someone somewhere might try to abuse it. Frankly, if you want to voluntarily abuse a drug, great. My interest is in relieving the suffering caused by obesity, not protecting people from the Darwin awards.
Imagine saying that “insulin should be expensive because some people use it for suicide and it has side-effects.”
If a doctor prescribes it for real reasons I respect that but right now it’s a celebrity weight loss “hack”
My friend has had 3 patients walk because she won’t prescribe ozempic to them. They are not obese or have some major medical consideration. They want to use it as a substitute for a diet that they don’t even really need.
The whole prescription system is a rent-seeking scheme that enriches various middlemen, including your friend.
How far have we fallen as a civilization that people have to meekly seek permission to take drugs? Bodily autonomy doesn’t extend to medicine, is that it? The unfathomable hypocrisy.
Why not? Is addiction illegal? At most I’d say education about the medication should be more available.
Edit obviously addiction is terrible but it’s a slippery slope to say " you can’t take this drug because of addiction risks" into “you can’t take this drug because I find it morally wrong”
I didn’t think it was an abuse of the medication, I thought the comment was just discussing side effects and potential complications from regular use of it
Not sure why you’re being downvoted so much, it’s an interesting point. If you make it too cheap and it has a lot of side effects, you are t really saving anyone money. You’re not even improving their health in the long run.
That being said, I have no idea how bad the long term effects are.
Except it does seem rather odd to keep a medicine from people whose lives it could save (obesity causes a lot more problems than diabetes), because someone somewhere might try to abuse it. Frankly, if you want to voluntarily abuse a drug, great. My interest is in relieving the suffering caused by obesity, not protecting people from the Darwin awards.
Imagine saying that “insulin should be expensive because some people use it for suicide and it has side-effects.”
If a doctor prescribes it for real reasons I respect that but right now it’s a celebrity weight loss “hack”
My friend has had 3 patients walk because she won’t prescribe ozempic to them. They are not obese or have some major medical consideration. They want to use it as a substitute for a diet that they don’t even really need.
The whole prescription system is a rent-seeking scheme that enriches various middlemen, including your friend.
How far have we fallen as a civilization that people have to meekly seek permission to take drugs? Bodily autonomy doesn’t extend to medicine, is that it? The unfathomable hypocrisy.
I don’t think it’s perfect but I can’t agree with people being able to walk around buying any medication at anytime without any oversight.
So are you a religious authoritarian or a garden variety fascist that you feel entitled to dictate to me what I can and cannot do with my body?
no clue how this is religious, which also I am not
so you’re down for people to grab oxy off the shelf I take it?
Why not? Is addiction illegal? At most I’d say education about the medication should be more available.
Edit obviously addiction is terrible but it’s a slippery slope to say " you can’t take this drug because of addiction risks" into “you can’t take this drug because I find it morally wrong”
I didn’t think it was an abuse of the medication, I thought the comment was just discussing side effects and potential complications from regular use of it
There is a lot abuse. Wealthy people shop around for doctors to prescribe because they want to lose weight with a shot.
It’s more than a shot. It changes your appetite.
Yes, and has practically no side effects. They should consider putting it in the water supply.
Please tell me you aren’t one of those anti-fluoride people.
I just suggested putting a medicine in the water supply. Why would I be against putting a mineral in the water supply?
Well for starters, ozempic does have common adverse side effects. So that’s one major difference.
And as a result, only the wealthy should be able to afford it?