From a hotel in Kyoto to a sandwich joint in Edinburgh, the world is becoming hostile toward Israelis who are learning that a vacation won’t shield them from the Gaza war.

During the nine months of war the Israeli tourist experience abroad has been marked by fears of antisemitism and efforts to avoid pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

According to reports by Israeli media and posts online, some of those worries have recently turned real for a number of Israeli tourists.Anecdotal incidents at touristic locations around the world are making it clear that even though there is no official policy of excluding Israelis, that is sometimes the situation on the ground.

An especially bumpy week began on June 17 at the Material Hotel in Kyoto, Japan, when an Israeli named Alex was informed that his reservation had been canceled due to the allegations of Israeli war crimes in Gaza. The Material told Alex that it was “not able to accept reservations from persons we believe might have ties to the Israeli army,” as reported by Israeli website Ynet.

The story made the rounds on social media, produced a stern protest letter from Israel’s ambassador in Tokyo, and led to a rebuke by the Kyoto municipality that the hotel had breached Japanese business law and must ensure that such a transgression won’t happen again.

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Italians already had Italy.

    In this case, a proper analogy would be if furries demanded a place to call their own.

    Would you just give it to them?

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or in a less ludicrous example, Romani people. It would still be met with relentless opposition from whoever you were trying to take the land from.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Italy is a worse example than that even. It wasn’t unified until 1861 and even then it was a country of two peoples. The North ruled at the expense of the South. (Yes I know there appear to be parallels to another, larger country with an 1861 event. But they are only skin deep.) And after World War 2 the country took care to be a democracy that represented the north and south.

      They use Italy as an example like it was always around and unified. But it really wasn’t.