• Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

      • azalty@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

          • Classy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That was the case for me, until I decided to read the article

              • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.