• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The most obvious answer is that all of those candidates were labeled as “other” for the purpose of reporting and collectively got 4.6%, and the chart maker didn’t want to redesign it to accommodate for not knowing individual results.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That would be fine if there were a detailed report of the results online or declared somewhere so people could check the results in each municipality. Instead, the https://www.cne.gob.ve/ is still down, I have no idea where to see where Maduro won and lost and by how much…all we have is that…which is clearly fucked.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It still doesn’t legitimize this as evidence. Focus instead on the disparity between polling and vote count. Looks like this was already widely debunked.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          polling can fail spectacularly. This is not about “evidence”, it is blatant obstruction by the official institutions that oversee the election, which is at least as bad. That is the only thing everyone is sure of at the moment.