• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    He also said that he would consider Linus Media Group unionizing a “personal failure,” which is about as good as you could typically expect from a business owner but still not great.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Giving him the benefit of the doubt, he probably meant that if a business owner treats his employees well, there shouldnt be a need to unionize. But that would mean he fundamentally misunderstands what a union is and why you want one. I dont know which is worse.

      • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your benefit of the doubt assumption is correct. He has explained it in detail a couple of times. Like you I find it unfortunate and frustrating.

        Still, based on some of the numbers they have talked about their employee retention is very good and considering how talented many of the people who work for him are, if it were a shitty place to work that could likely easily find work elsewhere. I have a number of criticisms of Linus and his ADHD snap judgments or out of touch privileged takes, but he still strikes me as someone that does genuinely want to do the right thing that got insanely lucky and had to adapt to a crazy situation no random person off thee street would ever be that prepared before.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      His POV on that from what I could tell was that he didn’t want a union to be necessary. He wasn’t opposed to the benefits one would provide, he just wanted to have a workplace where people didn’t need to unionize just to get those benefits.