• Landmammals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you ask the scientists in my local Facebook group, it could kill all of them. That is, the ones not already killed by vaccines and 5G.

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Fun fact, they were going to build one in the US crossing the borders of LA, TX, AR. They even dug out the damn hole, but they shit canned the whole project so now we’re just left with a random giant circular hole underground.

    Edited AK to AR. That would have been a bit excessive.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Guys, the trick is to get it partially built and then cancel funding. Then scientists will never trust you to fund anything ever again, and you get to act like science is a waste of money while you’re spending ridiculous sums on fighter jets.

    Yes, I am still bitter about Waxahatchie.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Budget: Military Complex > CERN

    Long term value to citizens: CERN > Miltary Complex

    All historical CERN expenses combined are a tiny fraction of the yearly expenses of the combined EU miltary

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      US Congress: Audit NASA > Audit the Pentagon

      EU: Audit CERN > Audit Luxemborg/Malta/UK

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah everything’s been kinda fucked ever since, hasn’t it… i mean… it was 2008 right before obama being elected and i really don’t think the “correct” path of the future would have involved r-money or mccain winning so at least SOME shit would be the same, but still…

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        LHC didn’t start seriously smashing shit (beyond previous energies done by other colliders) until after 2010 though. I think everything went tits up about 2012, tbh - the year they found the Higgs Boson. I kind-of jokingly subscribe to the idea that the world ended. I mean, it just checks so many boxes to me, it truly seems that the universe as it stands right now is fundamentally different than it should be after the passing of one single decade.

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          okay i can DEFINITELY agree with you about 2012, shit’s been super fucking weird since SPECIFICALLY that year.

          the worst day of my life was December 22nd 2012 and I remember it very clearly because I couldn’t figure out WHY.

          I just felt awful to a degree i have NEVER felt before or ever again since. Not even once. Not even a little.

          It was a distinct watershed moment that divided my entire life into “before” and “after”.
          I figured it was just some freak hormonal imbalance that walloped me out of nowhere but it’s weird that that was the only time and that it coincided with such a distinct … difference in how the world was between ‘before that’ and ‘after that’.

          now, the higgs boson event was on a different date, certainly, but that day… i will never be able to forget it.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    i hope someday we construct a collider that spans the entire circumference of the earth. But we’d probably have to build one that spans the circumference of the moon first, and then maybe mars, since the oceans are going to be a bit of a doozie to work around that we don’t have the technology for, whereas the interior of a collider is supposed to be evacuated, so, the moon almost kinda already handles that for us. heat might be an issue of course, but if we can figure out thermal radiator panels that can dump the heat straight into space, maybe we could pull it off…

    mars would address the heat issues, but those dust storms are no joke and the dust itself is microscopic toxic/caustic razors and it’ll try to get in everywhere and ruin fine instruments it touches. Moon dust is also really bad but there’s no wind to kick it up on the moon obviously…

    but damn. DAMN. imagine the fucking science we could get done with a LUNAR-SCALE PARTICLE COLLIDER!!!

    • Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The Moon’s daytime is half a month long and can reach 120 C so we’d need some pretty powerful heat shielding. And there’s no ozone layer to protect the electronics from radiation, and I’m pretty sure the Moon orbits outside of Earth’s magnetosphere. And the shielding used for such a project could also be used to fix climate change here (and terraform Venus later) with orbital parasols. And whatever unimaginable technology we’d need for such an ambitious project may as well be used to run a grid of electromagnets and power lines across Mars to give it a magnetic field

  • Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I hope we can build one that can use hydrogen fusion like the sun; such an energy source would make an excellent power source, even if small