• SkySyrup@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You are correct. Hollywood will simply change up a couple things and then use the assets.

    However, I‘m still undecided about how I think about whether generating AI art should count as Human-generated or not. On one hand, people can spend hours if not days or week perfecting a prompt with different tools like ControlNet, different promptstyles and etc. On the other hand, somebody comes up to midjourney, asks for a picture of a dragon wearing a T-Shirt and immediately gets an image that looks pretty decent. It’s probably not exactly what they wanted, but close enough, right? AI gets you 90% there what you want, and the other 10% is the super-hard part that takes forever. Anyway, sorry for dumping my though process from this comment chain on here xD

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, I am firmly in the camp where that isn’t art. The prompt writing can be a literary work but the result isn’t a work of art. You set up the environment that allowed the image to exist but you didnt make the image.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember this artist who used a jet engine to throw paint onto a big canvas. Was the resulting artwork made by the jet engine, based on what you’re saying?

        I’m not confrontational. I just like the discussion. This whole topic is, well, fascinating.