• hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree that income matters more than race. Obviously. But they cut out considering race, and then less black people made it through the admission process. You can’t say that you are a big fan of the process AND you wish there were different outcomes.

    Black people experience racism that has disadvantaged them, and it seems silly to think that we shouldn’t acknowledge that in processes that could give them a leg up.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The fact that black people are being disproportionately affected by this change means they were disproportionately represented before. You should not have a system that accounts for race at all. If two candidates are completely the same, gpa, extra curriculars, aps, etc. it shouldn’t be race just economics.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s where economics comes into play like I mentioned. She could also have a much better essay and rec letters. That comic does not address the issue being discussed.

      • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        So the question then becomes, why are there less black candidates that can get in when race blind? Are black people just dumber? Or has the system they grew up in acted on them in a way that disadvantaged them? Because if we agree with the former, we are racists, and if we agree on the latter, well then it’s unfair to them because the system actively worked against them.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Before, affirmative action placed race at a higher level of consideration for mid to low tier candidates. Colleges may skip over candidates that had slightly better test scores or an extra ap in order to meet diversity standards. When you remove the race of the candidate as a factor, the other qualifiers play a larger role, and black candidates who had been advantaged by thr system now lose this specific advantage.

          • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            But if the pool of candidates between the races were equal, why did fewer black candidates make it in? Is the new system racist against against black candidates, are black people less deserving of slots, or is there something that happens pre-applying for college that makes black candidates less appealing?

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              The pool of candidates are not equal. There are less black candidates overall. Less black candidates made it in because they were less competitive students overall. Less aps, lower gpa, less extra curriculars, lower test scores, etc. If you want to improve the black student population, you need to offer and encourage and offer more of these then complain by the time it’s too late.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Nope, i want a system that removes ethnicities entirely. Ideally race is replaced with economic status, which will still advantage black students the most.