• VubDapple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Many people do not grasp the sheer size of the disparity between the truly wealthy and everyone else.

  • testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lack of good examples of countries that are successful without being capitalist?

    Pretty ubiquitously non-capitalist countries have a pretty poor track record.

    I often hear the phrase, capitalism is terrible, but it’s the least bad of the terrible options.

    As an aside, I’m arguing here for capitalism, not billionaires. Supporting capitalism isn’t an endorsement of a complete lack of controls and safeguards.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lack of good examples of countries that are successful without being capitalist?

      There are many. The USSR, PRC, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, etc. Have all drastically improved on previous conditions, achieving large increases in life expectancy, democratization, literacy rates, access to healthcare, housing, education, and more. Read Blackshirts and Reds.

      Pretty ubiquitously non-capitalist countries have a pretty poor track record.

      This is false. What are you specifically tracking? Freedom for the bourgeoisie?

      I often hear the phrase, capitalism is terrible, but it’s the least bad of the terrible options.

      The phrase is typically used to describe democracy, not Capitalism.

      As an aside, I’m arguing here for capitalism, not billionaires. Supporting capitalism isn’t an endorsement of a complete lack of controls and safeguards.

      It doesn’t matter what you support, the Superstructure, ie laws and safeguards, comes primarily from the Base, ie the Mode of Production.

      Markets move themselves regardless of people’s will towards centralized syndicates, monopolies over production. These make themselves ripe for siezure and central planning, markets themselves prepare the proletariat for running a socialized economy as they coalesce over time. This is why Marx says the bourgeoisie produces “above all else, its own gravediggers.” There is no maintaining Capitalism, it eliminates itself over time.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago
    1. Because it’s in their personal interests to perpetuate capitalism
    2. Because liberal ideology is hegemonic and it is what most people have been raised to believe
    3. Plenty of other reasons why people hold the political beliefs they hold, surely it’s obvious that there are many ways that someone can arrive at a belief system
  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Regarding capitalism, in reality, it is the best system we’ve seen so far.

    Yes, theoretically other systems could be better for the general public. But in reality, they never have been.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Many don’t even do it intentionally, they just don’t grasp concepts like Historical and Dialectical Materialism, which requires reading lengthy books to fully grasp. They may be anti-Capitalist at heart, but without a solid understanding of theory they play into bourgeois hands.

    There’s also the fact that the ideas held by society are a reflection of the Mode of Production.

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pretty sure they’d take everything you just wrote and say, “that sounds like critical race theory, which Jesus said was bad.”

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What de industrialization?

          US is second largest industrial output and it has been rising.

          Unless you mean jobs after NAFTA and code changes… Which is true but manufacturing employment is on the rise post covid reforms

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The US shifted the vast majority of its production overseas, which is why it’s seen as a “service economy.”

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              US did offshore no doubt but it was not a vast majority. You can check the numbers, there was some decline in employment but US has high tech factories and industrial base is now growing quickly even with job growth since covid.

              The reason it is largely a service economy is due to growth in service sector after industrialization. Once people got all their needs with goods met, they started buying service.

              Think about all the food joints we have now for example. This is fairly recent thing. Sure food out always existed but not like this.

              Also, people have god walkers, people buy insurance etc all this is kinda recent in big picture thing

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I am aware of the process, the US produces the vast majority of its commodities oversees before “finishing” or “assembling” in the US. It’s Imperialism in action, where it hyper-exploits the Global South for super-profits.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Right but we started this here with claim that US de industrialized which I saying is not accurate and it is a common misconception thrown around.

    • Random123@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It doesnt even require that much reading of such subjects. All it takes is to not be brainwashed by media and politicians.

      Critical thought and self awareness is all it takes

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m sorry, but I entirely disagree. Dialectical and Historical Materialism are incredibly far-removed from standard American discourse and takes quite a bit to understand, oversimplifying it is dangerous. If all it took to be a Marxist-Leninist was critical thought and self-awareness, the US would have had a proletarian revolution already.