“liberty without socialism is privilege, injustice; and socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality.’ Mikhail Bakunin

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    Tankie is authoritarian “communism”. Tankies tend to support the brutal regimes of Stalin, Mao, and more recent Russian imperialism such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    Needless to say these regimes supported by tankies are far from the communism envisioned by people like Marx, which was achieved much more closesly in anarcho-communist revolutions, such as the Ukraine’s anarchist territories and the Paris Commune.

    • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      I still believe you are needlessly reducing the scope of that word to only communists. Many blood thristy supporters are “tankies”, while being fascist, or simply dumb

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        A communist would believe in “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” (Karl Marx).

        However Lenin, and to a greater degree his authoritarian successors acted according to the slogan, “To each according to his contribution”, which even they admitted was not in accordance with true communism. Lenin even used the slogan, “He who does not work, neither shall he eat“.

        From Lenin, The State and Revolution, 1917

        The socialist principle, “He who does not work shall not eat”, is already realized; the other socialist principle, “An equal amount of products for an equal amount of labor”, is also already realized. But this is not yet communism, and it does not yet abolish “bourgeois law”, which gives unequal individuals, in return for unequal (really unequal) amounts of labor, equal amounts of products. This is a “defect” according to Marx, but it is unavoidable in the first phase of communism

        Unfortunately their “first phase” evolved into an authoritarian regime instead of the stateless heirarchyless utopia Marx envisioned.