• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You show me an example of anyone suffering PTSD because their parents showed their partner baby pictures.

    i literally provided myself as an example in this, i quite literally said that i would consider it a violation of privacy, and no that’s not PTSD, but PTSD is the extreme end of things here. We aren’t just talking about PTSD.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You claiming that it would give you PTSD is not evidence that anyone has suffered or is suffering from PTSD because of it. That’s just you making an assumption about a situation you’ve apparently never actually faced.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          i quite literally said that i would consider it a violation of privacy,

          That is what you said.

          What you would consider it is irrelevant to what people who have experienced it have considered it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s amazing that you got this far into the conversation and, despite my repeated mention of a daughter, you think my baby had testicles. And I never suggested she was anything but cisgendered, so I’m really not sure how you missed that. But based on the rest of your silly question, I have a few guesses.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Only someone who knows nothing about external female anatomy thinks “nards” could possibly be a gender neutral term. But do tell me what plural parts of her genitalia that would show up in a typical naked baby photo would count as “nards.”

                  Believe it or not, I don’t have a single photo of my daughter’s ovaries or fallopian tubes. They’re way too far up inside her for a camera to capture.

                  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Well that’s reassuring, it’s only her external genitalia you’re advocating tooth and nail for showing to her future partner.

                    Glad we cleared that up.

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    They’re way too far up inside her for a camera to capture.

                    Unless the cameras are designed for that. Usually found in hospitals and on plumbers. And the pictures that come out of those are not identifiable as who they’re from.

                    I definitely agree with you that “nards” is in no way gender neutral as a term. I wonder how “gender neutral” @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee would think it to refer to an infant boy as having a “hoo-haa”, “vag” or a “pus”?