Gizmodo filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the FTC to get complaints sent to the federal agency about crypto scams that pretend to be affiliated with Musk. We obtained 247 complaints, all filed between Feb. and Oct. of this year, and they’re filled with stories of people who believed they were watching ads for authentic crypto investments sanctioned by Musk on social media.

The ads sometimes featured the names of Musk’s various companies, like SpaceX, Tesla, and X, while other times they utilized Musk’s association with neo-fascist presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Some people in the complaints believed they were talking directly with Musk, a sadly common story that has popped up in news reports before. But they weren’t talking with Musk, of course. They were communicating with scammers engaging in what’s called pig butchering—the name for a type of fraud popularized in the mid-2010s where scammers extract as much money as possible through flattery and promises of tremendous profits if the victim just “invests” where they’re told.

  • S13Ni@lemmy.studio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ngl I always hated crypto but this is like best argument for crypto. Wtf I’m even doing at my job, I should be doing something actually important like scramming Elon Musk fans.

      • S13Ni@lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t really like idea, I can’t see how it could be done in anyway that doesn’t lead to already rich people insider trading it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I like the basic fundamental idea, but the implementation is dreadful.

        I’m all for coming up with some kind of method for validating decentralized information but the system that cryptocurrencies use is highly inefficient.