A major new report from FairSquare, published today, identifies serious structural flaws within FIFA, football’s global governing body, that have resulted in the organisation contributing to a wide range of social harms, not least very serious and systematic human rights abuses, and that preclude it from fulfilling one of its core stated objectives of developing the game.

Substitute: The case for the external reform of FIFA, a 174-page report based on extensive research, addresses FIFA’s governance practices and assesses the impact of its operations both before and after a set of critical governance reforms implemented in 2016. It concludes that there has been little to no improvement since these reforms, and that in some key elements of FIFA’s operations there has been obvious regression. The report argues that FIFA is not capable of self-regulation and that in the absence of external reform it will continue to cause or exacerbate human rights abuses and other social harms.

  • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been wondering for a while: What is preventing a bunch of not-drowning-in-corruption countries from just not recognising FIFA any more, saying they’re sick of the blatant corruption, and starting their own international association? I would think you could get a lot of the major football nations to support something like that, because it looks like it’s mostly Quatar, Saudi-Arabia and the likes which benefit from the current system…

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 seconds ago

      Corruption goes both ways (FIFA gets some, country decisionmakers get some). Also, maybe it would not be difficult to get major football nationa to support a new org, but to get them to support the same new org? Probably very difficult.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Isn’t FIFA widely regarded as one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet? I mean, the article isn’t wrong, but that ship sailed a long time ago, it’s a bit late to be acting like this is bombshell news.

    • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The news certainly isn’t new, but there’s a difference between knowing something that is 99% likely to be true and having hard, factual evidence, and just having a formal report on it.

      We all know that Epstein didn’t kill himself. It was the most blatant political murder of the century. But there’s a difference between knowing Epstein didn’t kill himself, and a major investigatory body releasing a report that analyses all available information and confirms accurately and without bias, that Epstein didn’t kill himself.

  • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I knew Gianni Infantino would go further than his predecessor. The real high bidders were just getting started, when the FIFA scandal happened.