MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square371fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down1181
arrow-up1959arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square371fedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·2 days agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
minus-squaremoitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoThe comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment. You’re interpreting.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
The comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment.
You’re interpreting.