• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I think it’s dangerous to be unscathed by governments deciding which publishers publish “truth”, and which don’t.

    To not care if the “law” applies to 100% of the population, or only 95%. Some more equal under the law than others.

    I bring up 3, because the idea behind www was to counteract the points above.

    Imagine the same techniques used by a government you do not agree with. It’s very scary, no?

    • jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That has nothing to do with what I was answering to OP (who seems to have a difficult time translating ‘operating in’ to ‘being reachable from’), I don’t know why you are trying to debate (?) me on something else completely. Same goes for the www, I’ve never called it that.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sorry your anger doesn’t allow you to see the connection between the technical implementation, and philosophy of www, and your own answer to OPs question.