• Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If it’s done and dusted because they already have your data then why are they constantly trying to get more?

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s like this. Your front door is left open and while, magically, no one can touch or take anything in your house, strangers are allowed to enter at will and eyeball everything, see all your bills, your kids stuff, your laundry, dirty and clean, etc. How would that ever be ok? And yet we say this is ok electronically every day.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    And furthermore - the companies in question are true megacorps, ie evey bit of additional power/money they get (and for the matter of this pov: you give them) goes to absolutely the shorties practices and abuses ever.

    It’s a moral thing - I protect my data for the same reason I recycle or consider my (indirect*) carbon footprint.

    (*indirect bcs more like which companies or people I support)

    With your data you support misinformation, deregulation lobbying, (any) government shitty things, ad culture, anything to protect the stock market as-is or their stock falls, dogshit approach to keeping their respective monology over their market, … and their size and reach allows them to just be bigger than a lot of things like municipalities, even smol countries, the quid-pro-quo aint in the peoples favor.

    I simplified example (bcs someone else already made it happen) - imagine, if Google autonomous cars go on sale, suddenly railways projects disappear around you.

  • dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    a good point. while I appreciate all the usual parables to explain the issue, to me it’s quite simple. namely, me and the evildoers have a fundamental disagreement on the concept of “whose shit is my shit?” the moment their actions indicate it’s theirs, I am in active resistance mode.

    • Luckyfriend222@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This. So much this. How can people not grasp this idea? Companies don’t care about something you bought 5 years ago. They are interested in your current data.

  • MagnumDovetails@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I think some people believe that this is a single event; like they get your email and that’s it. They don’t realize or care that it is a constant ongoing collection of any and all possible information that is held by a company whose motive is profit. These companies are associating ip addresses with devices and activities all the time. Turns out the older your data the less it is worth. Stop when you can- even if it’s a slow process. Privacy is a human right

    • couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      IP addresses

      MAC addresses (physical devices, bluetooth devices in range)

      Wifi access points

      Cell tower access points

      Browser cookies

      Browsing history

      Search history

      Email (and its contents)

      GPS paths traveled

      Contacts

      Apps installed, apps used, frequency of use

      Hours inactive

      Photos, videos

      Just thinking about Google here as I don’t use meta products, but my phone is android…

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Right. It’s the difference between I’ve been to Holland and I’ve lived in Springfield Missouri and I am at Holland right now and my house in Missouri is currently unoccupied and full of valuables.

      Time of info can make a heck of a difference

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m tired, boss.

      It’s a very alluring argument, to give up, to let them have it. But, not alluring enough.

    • corvus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Turns out the older your data the less it is worth

      That’s why I think is not the best approach to delete your accounts. Keep an old phone with all your accounts and every now and then watch a random video, make a random search, follow a random profile, and so on with all your accounts. Over time your true profile will become obsolete and buried under fake data.

    • seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Is this specific one valid anymore? I remember seeing in the last year or two that Google location history is now encrypted and it now no longer auto backs up the data, you can enable it though, so the data is now only on the device.

  • 7112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For many people it’s easier to not care… they don’t want to bother with long term consequences of their behaviors.

    I simply ask them if they would be OK with a company taking money out their bank account.

    Your data is valuable. Why give it away for free?

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Hey I’m going to buy your location data tonight.”

      “I like to know where you go on Thursdays”

      This what Google, Facebook, X, your ISP, and the junk apps on your phone actually get from you, and everyone around you when you use their creepy apps.

      Hit me up on Mastadon, use Tor, use DDG, we should have an restraining order against these creeps. Worse yet they don’t just want it for themselves they sell and share it with company, countries, anyone they like, and don’t tell you.

      This is how I WANT to talk about because it’s how I feel. Their just strangers, I wouldn’t tell a stranger on the street any of this. I feel like this is such a fringe thought for people though.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I simply ask them if they would be OK with a company taking money out their bank account.

      This is as unconvincing an analogy as , and for the same reason.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Unconvincing to whom? That campaign did an amazing job of equating copyright to property ownership for an entire generation.

        It’s not accurate, but I think we’ve seen that it can be very convincing for most people.

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I wouldn’t recommend trying to trick people into caring about their privacy: it’s not good for your reputation or your long-term relationship with them.

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Which generation is that? I’ll be honest, I’ve yet to talk to someone who really gives a crap about where the content they’re consuming is coming from. Hell, most people I’ve dealt with don’t give a crap about content being pirated whenever it happens to be the more convenient option.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    That’s why you never say data. They’ve heard it all before. Call them a cuck. They’re fucking your phone and you’re left to watch, anti-libre software.