• dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I stopped distro hopping pretty much after trying arch. I still love arch, but my new love is chimera Linux.

    For servers I used to run Debian stable, but these days I’m pretty set on alpine.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m enjoying Linux Mint so far

    I’m thinking I may hope around to a distro using a newer kernel but meh

    Mint is pretty nice

    Edit: My “meh” is because Mint has been super stable for me and I’m not really sure that the effort to switch distros is worth it given that my systems are already rock solid.

  • misterwu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fedora. Super stable, super smooth. Used the thinkpad + fedora combo for over 10 years and will use it for 10 more.

  • zib@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    On my desktops and laptops, I’ve been slowly migrating from Mint to EndeavourOS. Mint will always have a special place in my heart and I don’t think I’ll ever abandon it completely, but I’ve been falling in love with Endeavour lately. The Arch ecosystem had a bit of a learning curve, but once it clicked, it felt great. And then for servers, I’ve finally switched away from Ubuntu over to Debian. The familiar environment without all the bloat feels perfect to me.

  • wesleyote@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    my arch systems have been great for years now. had one breakage that was not my own fault though.

    i also have some older thinkpads with endeavor and they’re working great as well.

    i would distrohop but i’m too accostomed to the arch repos and aur at this point.

  • codebam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve been using NixOS for the past few months and it’s been great. Before NixOS I was using Fedora Silverblue so immutable distros aren’t a new thing to me. I like that NixOS has a configuration I can keep backed up. I can copy different options from my desktop to laptop easily. I’m still learning about flakes and the nix language to be able to do more advanced things, but overall NixOS is a great distro if you want something you can configure once and be done.

  • ebits21@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bluefin, very happy. Nice toys on top of an atomic Silverblue base. Love the concept.

  • qweertz@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I regret ever having switched to the amateur distro that is Nobara bc I was too lazy to set up Feodra a 2nd time after the Grub fiasco Arch (and thus my daily driver back then EndeavourOS) had lol

    Will switch the second OpenSuSe Slowroll becomes stable

    • DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I just switched to Nobara actually for my steamdeck and I was liking it a lot more than SteamOS but I was having some issues. (Ethernet just doesn’t show up, indexing with baloo doesn’t start)

      Can you elaborate on why exactly it’s amateur?

      • qweertz@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It has no large community nor an organization behind it.
        Leading to a lot of trouble for me personally, it’s the 2nd month now (after multiple updates) that my Gnome wayland desktop hasn’t been working properly at all (like xwayland programmes displaying as a blank transparency, me not being able to start certain ones) and switching to X11 works but it’s buggy af and sometimes freezes for a few second

        I suspect that it has been a problem with the nvidia driver after having updated it and I have never had those problems before

        Don’t get me wrong Glorious Eggroll is doing good work but qa (due to size) leaves smth do be desired

  • Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fedora fees like a nice and tightly integrated distro. I’m no apple fan but I can appreciate consistent UX, I feel like Fedora for now is the closest to that level of experience, whilst pioneering in desktop-centric technologies.

    I have this looming fear that IBM will somehow fuck everything over someday, but as far as I understand, the Fedora project still operates with the same level of autonomy as they did pre-aquisition.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My distro hoping days are about done. I started with ubuntu -> KDE Neon -> Arch -> Manjaro -> Solus -> Manjaro -> Pop_OS -> Fedora.

    I’m sticking with fedora because I love the ideology behind the project and the pace of updates works perfect for me. Not too fast but still very up-to-date. Also I used to hate gnome but after using fedora I love it, I realized I didn’t hate gnome but hated all the clunk other distro would add to it. I am interested in NixOS but for now I’m gonna continue to stick with fedora, might hop to fedora silverblue tho.

  • Blaze@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m running OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.

    99% happy, once in a blue moon there is a library issue during an update, I have to wait a few days, that’s it.

    Very solid KDE experience, all of the things I wanted to do worked out of the box. Very solid.

  • Amanda@aggregatet.org
    link
    fedilink
    Svenska
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m kind of souring on Fedora Kinoite. I generally sometimes pop in to try how Linux is doing, and I had great hopes for KDE Plasma 6 and immutable distributions for stability. However, I’ve found that many things in the UI are still wonky and broken, fonts don’t render well, and I keep running into limitations in the flatopak/containers ecosystem.

    Here are a few paper cuts:

    • I can’t get the launcher to do web searches despite them being available and configured, even when manually invoking the keyword
    • fonts look blurry and render weirdly; all of the household macs produce ok output on the same screen so it isn’t the issue
    • I really miss having consistent emacs text navigation bindings but shortcuts like C-a/C-e are already taken and remapping is difficult to get to work consistently
    • I’ve been trying to compile parts of the Linux minidisc system but the dependencies aren’t available outside of a toolbox and USB isn’t available inside. I think, it’s difficult to google and I’ve time boxed trying to fix it to N hours and exhausted those, so it’s either impossible or too difficult
    • for a long time Obsidian (from flatpak) couldn’t agree with the window manager to draw drop shadows and window decorations which meant that figuring out where obsidian ended and the white window underneath it began was literally impossible
    • sometimes the wired USB keyboard stops working if I unplug it and doesn’t start working until I’ve plugged it in/unplugged it a few times
  • JAWNEHBOY@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tried out Mint, Debian w/ KDE, switched to Debian w/ gnome, now settled into Cachy OS. Only thing I’m wanting for is support for my Dell Canvas touch and totem, but I expect that’ll get pushed to Open Tablet Drivers before long

  • EndeavourOS. Arch, but easy to install. I’m thrilled with it, although I suspect I’d be even happier if I’d have tried one of the convenience installers for the base. Endeavor is has prettier defaults, so less fussing with basic stuff.

    Otherwise, I’m thrilled. I have Artix on my laptop, and while I like not having systemd on it, some things are a bit more kludgey, and I spend more time on maintenance and working to fill gaps. Like, there are not dinit entries for every service, and I have to write them myself; which is absurdly easy, but still. Maybe in a couple years Artix will be less of a chore; in the meantime I’m preferring EndesvorOS.

    I do not like the frequency of reboots necessitated by kernel upgrades. I know that I could mask it, but IME that eventually causes problems with packages than make .ko kernel modules; it’s just more things to fail, and it makes me really wish Linus would have just based Linux on MINIX.

    Anyway, I have 4 computers I deal with which are Debian based, and I never love Arch more than when I have to do something on Debian. Two are Mint, which are infected with flatpack, and I really hate those.

    • Kabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I do not like the frequency of reboots necessitated by kernel upgrades. I know that I could mask it, but IME that eventually causes problems with packages than make .ko kernel modules; it’s just more things to fail, and it makes me really wish Linus would have just based Linux on MINIX.

      Here’s a tip that you might not be aware of: Arch has an LTS kernel. It may seem counter intuitive to run Arch and not have the latest, bleeding edge kernel, but the upside is that you get a stabler, less breakage-prone system.

      • I didn’t know about the LTS kernel. How does that interact with module packages, like the fscking Broadcom support packages, or bcachesfs (before it for mainlined)? That’s where I’ve historically run into issues with pinning the kernel.

        I will absolutely look into this, though. If it prevents the “you need to reboot or else” messages after every Syu, I’m in. On Arch, when you get a message like that, it’s best heeded.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Another pro tip: You don’t need to update Arch every day.
          I update about once a month. Just make sure you read the news and deal with your .pacnew files.

          • I’ve gone months between updates. On servers, that’s a little more risky because it CVEs, which can also apply to the kernel, but LTS is probably safe enough there: if there’s a kernel CVE, LTS will be updated.

            I’ve had trouble with pinning the kernel before, though. Last time I did it, I went several months and forgotten I’d done it, and my system got itself wedged because some package was expecting a newer kernel; it took me a while to figure out.

            LTS might be a better option, since that will be caught be dependency management. Pinning can cause version dependency mismatch issues.

        • Kabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’ve never had to deal with Broadcom drivers or pinned the kernel, so I can’t tell you anything about that. The LTS kernel (currently 6.6.32-1) still updates regularly, albeit not nearly as often as the stock Arch kernel, so that means fewer updates that require a reboot.

          Just install linux-lts and linux-lts-headers via pacman, and you’re good to go.