In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 13th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.
Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.
Tatakae!
Hey everything, the massage is highly defined by now.
5·5 months agoI can say with confidence that at least some call it homocide map, with the evidence you’ve provided. 🧐
Those other two are also just costumed cubicle workers.
Classic first peak mindset right here.
Awwwwwwwwwww
Giorno’s theme turned on in my head, though it’s not even the correct Joestar.
Hmmm, society and collapsing are on the rise, while the West and fallen are declining.
“Член”. It’s like “member”, also has the same second meaning. It’s the more formal term for penis.
Buy gold!