• 2 Posts
  • 603 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle
  • Yeah, I’m just saying that the benefit of using such a regex isn’t massive (unless you’re building a service which can’t send a mail).

    a@b is a syntactically correct e-mail address. Most combinations of letters, an @-symbol and more letters will be syntactically correct, which is what most typos will look like. The regex will only catch fringe cases, such as a user accidentally hitting the spacebar.

    And then, personally, I don’t feel like it’s worth pulling in one of those massive regexes (+ possibly a regex library) for most use-cases.



  • Well, and remember: If in doubt, send them an e-mail. You probably want to do that anyways to ensure they have access to that mailbox.

    You can try to use a regex as a basic sanity check, so they’ve not accidentally typed a completely different info into there, but the e-mail standard allows so many wild mail addresses, that your basic sanity check might as well be whether they’ve typed an @ into there.











  • I have been thinking, with how closely inspired lots of Pokémon are from real animals, that you could probably come up with a collectible card game or such, using real animals.

    I mean, maybe I’m just being an old person and kids wouldn’t find that cool, but I certainly felt at some point, that I would’ve spent my time better, if I had learned about biology rather than made-up Pokémon stats…


  • Ephera@lemmy.mltoCurated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksDenny's
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    A few years ago, I worked in a warehouse and one of my coworkers wanted to call for a Dennis across the warehouse. She’s not a native speaker, so she didn’t know which syllable to emphasize, so she shouted “DENNIIIIIS”, which ended up sounding like “Denise”.

    That is all. 🙃


  • Ephera@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzOopsies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah, the formulation is a bit off here. With opt-out, you have no way to measure consent, because you can’t discern between people who actually consent and those who just haven’t opted out, for lack of knowledge or other reasons.

    These societies have simply weighed up the two options and decided that saving lives is more important than leaving personal freedom intact at all costs.






  • Problem is that none of the algorithms actually care about showing you things you like.

    Ads try to sell you on things that you wouldn’t otherwise buy. Occasionally, they may just inform you about a good product that you simply didn’t know about, but there’s more money behind manipulating you into buying bad products, because it’s got a brand symbol.

    And content recommendation algorithms don’t care about you either. They care about keeping you on the platform for longer, to look at more ads.
    To some degree, that may mean showing you things you like. But it also means showing you things that aggravate you, that shock you. And the latter is considered more effective at keeping users engaged.