I think it was less overt racism, but still pretty racist.
But mostly because Classism and Racism were pretty intertwined back in the day, what with non-white people essentially being entirely disallowed from actually being a higher class.
I think it was less overt racism, but still pretty racist.
But mostly because Classism and Racism were pretty intertwined back in the day, what with non-white people essentially being entirely disallowed from actually being a higher class.
Does it get contaminated with something like the cooling water of a nuclear power plant?
This doesn’t happen unless the reactor was sabotaged. Cooling water that interacts with the core is always a closed-loop system. For exactly this reason.
You should read what the electoral college does, because that’s not what it does.
There are no downvotes, so I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.
Ben Garrison is a right-wing idiot. He doesn’t know jack about much of anything.
Maybe they are, but it’s not “absolutely zero” like you said.
True, but giving money for free isn’t a proper way of fighting with poverty.
It literally is. Study after study proves just giving people money with no strings attached gives massive benefits for essentially no net cost.
https://college.unc.edu/2021/03/universal-basic-income/
The fact that you don’t know this proves you either ignore this, or don’t search anything to confirm you’re correct.
Do you regularly get malware from xbox controllers?
Because they don’t always use condoms, and that loophole is so obvious even a vegetable could see through it.
Judges aren’t stupid.
Steam has no competitors because nobody is competing with them, not because they are forcing nobody to compete with them.
Steam isn’t abusing their dominant position to prevent competition. Other companies could make their own storefront and compete with steam. Nobody does in a way that’s actually comparable to steam.
Steam has a monopoly, but it’s not because steam is actively keeping it that way.
The whole purpose of art is to be an outlet for expressing ourselves as human beings. It exists out of this need for expression; part of what makes a work worth appreciating is the human person(s) behind that said work and the effort and skill they put into making it.
This is completely and utterly your own opinion, not a fact. I know several people who can’t draw for shit, due to various reasons, but now AI allows them to create images they enjoy. One of them has aphantasia (They literally cannot imagine images).
This is basically trying to argue there’s only 1 correct way to make “art”, which is complete and utter bullshit. Imagine trying to say that a sculpture isn’t art because it was 3D printed instead of chiseled. It makes 0 sense for the method of making the art to impact whether or not it is art. “Expression” can take many forms. Why is this form invalid?
Grammar is good and stuff
How dare you good grammar want
What about the people that don’t have a soul
Or, all doors should have an obvious mechanical backup that doesn’t require that.
And devout jews still have rabbis suck the blood off the freshly circumcised baby as tradition dictates.
Jewish babies get an immediate bj to make up for being circumcised?
What
1000 miles a week is under 130 a day.
Just charge it at home every day and you’re good.
Why do we need people to be landlords?
Housing coops and government-owned housing work out fine.
It’s a package deal, really.