• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m taking the bait.

    The art he prompted was drawn from and trained by art that wasn’t his. The art was created by unsuspecting artists and then was blundered together like a frog until it created the image. He may have edited the image later on with a 3rd party program. But that’s still altering art built from an amalgamation of others art.

    And this isn’t the same as line tracing or referencing other’s art because that still requires the user to put pen to paper and wholly create something by hand. Or hand to digital modeling software. Something that actually takes hours of work and concentration. Not coming back to your PC to change the wording in your prompt and then walk away for an hour or whatever while it blends stuff together for you.

    If the original creator of the art work should get the copyright then the thousands of artists who drew the original training material should get those copyrights.

    This is the same problem with AI in other fields. It’s drawn from the work of humans.

    Moreover, I don’t want to remove the human element from art ever.




  • Mathazzar@lemmy.worldtoRPGMemes @ttrpg.networkFight me on it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Your number 2 is based around cultural, not species differences. Two humans raised in two different cultures could end up very different.

    There could be two tribes of goblins. One that began eating people out of desperation and now just do it because it’s tradition. The other could have grown up in close relationships with their nongoblin neighbors and are seen as a valuable part of their region.

    So untying evilness to their race isn’t being race blind or pretending people down have struggles - it’s removing the shoehorning that occurred.