the the quick answer type stuff is coming from DDGs systems.
which doesn’t an index make, more like a fetcher for specific data
The alternative search engine that does what’s right, we believe that privacy is a human right and that a true alternative must have its own index 👉 https://www.mojeek.com/
the the quick answer type stuff is coming from DDGs systems.
which doesn’t an index make, more like a fetcher for specific data
nope, it was yandex + bing, now bing: https://www.searchenginemap.com/
qwant and ecosia are both using bing, with the latter using google sometimes: https://www.searchenginemap.com/ map needs updating for that latter point
indeed so, thanks for flagging this I’ll get it raised so we can see what’s going on there
probably a sample size issue, we crawl and index everything we are able to; have seen many of this kind of site in the past, and finding them is something that other people have said they enjoy about mojeek
our preference is always to find out why the block is happening and try to convince people it should be otherwise; widespread abuse of robots.txt does no-one any good, having been crawling and indexing for so long it’s a standard that we understand and are quite fond of
we can see some of the perils and pitfalls of it too, but web builders need to be given some tools and assurances that those tools will work for them
IP already hits a wall, also better to not get a reputation as a bad bot, it’s taken a while to get known for being friendly and respecting rules, to us you should follow robots
We make money from our API, what they’re referencing is a beta ads programme which was running
Agree to disagree here, but I’ll refer to Cory Doctorow for a contextual vs behavioral/tracking ads comparison, one which is very good: https://pluralistic.net/2020/08/05/behavioral-v-contextual/#contextual-ads (applied to the media, but the general thread is relevant)
which language are we talking?
Reddit doesn’t allow us to crawl: https://www.reddit.com/robots.txt
not sure what’s happening there for you, speed is one of the things which people frequently say we do well for
qwant is bing, mainly
we make money mainly from our api, our investors are patient private capital and we don’t take vc, appreciate your point but these are fundamentally different situations, our ads (when they run) will also be contextual so more of a ddg situation than a “makes users into products to be sold to advertisers”
fair enough if it’s not for you though
The Express? There’s definitely a not-reading-it option
forks of firefox still keeping things going such as mullvad browser, waterfox, librewolf
Thanks a lot; these have been raised.
I think Mojeek is probably the only search engine that listens this much to user feedback. Is there a Lemmy community or something similar where one kann submit queries like these?
We have a Discourse: https://community.mojeek.com/ but also take these direct from search results pages (there’s a Submit feedback button) or via https://www.mojeek.com/about/contact. It’s all super useful for us so thanks in advance.
Mojeek also displays significantly more individual entries in its search results than Google or Bing
Ah, yeah, that’s from a blogger called Jack Yan who writes a lot on how many results you can actually get out of results 1-10 from n. What he’s saying there, which is correct on checking, is that we will always display 1,000 results when we have them, whereas Google and Bing tend to either stop when you get somewhere in the 200/300s, or just repeat results.
Thanks a lot, I’ve raised the Kdenlive query. When it comes to searching for stuff with “yt-dlp” you mean there’s normally another phrase or words in the query? Do you have an example; understand the problem but just trying to raise it with as much of a solid example as possible 🙏
*or Bing depending upon where you are