Not possible for me 🫠

Person 1: “fuck you!”

Person 2: “a real fuck to you to”

Didn’t notice you were op, my bad. Also I’m not trying to teach you a lesson, I just tried to clarify your message for others.

Always being told you are wrong growing up puts pressure on masking to always try to be right and gives an all-or-nothing thinking.

It is OK to not be perfect. It is something I have recently accepted about myself, and hope others can as well. 🩷

The irony if being stuck because of yourself isn’t bad, he just worded it badly.

It’s easy to interpret his message as negative because of depression, which is doubly ironic given the context of this conversation.

That’s what he is saying in a bad way. The people in the comic are technically right, but since you think you deserve the punishment, you are stuck. If you manage to get away from that negative thinking, you’ve done the biggest part of getting out of depression, and from there it is easier to do the rest without the destructive self esteem.

He should’ve used more words.

I use a fork to eat cheesedoodles. They are perfectly porous for the fork to pierce Adhd stick

Correlation does not mean causation!

/s

The technology needed to inhabit Mars would 100% benefit the life on earth. Just lookup all the tech we got from the Apollo missions.

You can’t do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.

Do electrical engineer with renewable or environmental focus and you’ll have a more even ratio.

I instinctively closed your comment after reading “short attention span” because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.

I agree with your arguments. We’re on the same side of all of this.

I disagree on having to remove one if both are bad. It would be like the trolley problem. 10 people suffer repeatedly indefinitely vs infinitely many suffering eventually. Moving all use to sugar cane will be worse for the environment than spreading some honey and some sugar cane. See my previous monocultulturalism point.

Personally I think honey vs sugar cane is equal, so for me the choice is bad either way. I don’t know which is worse, I try to use less, but what I use I feel is ambivalent, so I use both.

I am not vegan, but simply trying to understand how honey is bad, but as you say “unavoidable collateral damage of agriculture” or not.

There are many ways agriculture could be less harm, less pesticides, less monotone growing practices, more spread out growing. We do not have to accept these practices to not starve.

I don’t think honey collecting is worse than agriculture (even of direct plants for human consumption), so I don’t think vegans should discount honey.

Do you avoid all sugar products, or just honey?

Sugar growing also kills animals. You cannot avoid all harm, so why discount honey for the harm you know, but not discounting harm from growing sugar?

Reducing harm, sure, but it seems selective to discount honey for small amount of harm, when other things you (assumed) eat do equal (potentially unknown to you) harm.

Do you need to know every process of growing/transporting something to eat it? Or does you list of edible products shrink as you learn every new form of harm?

(Strawman)

Killing a few bees when collecting honey

Vs

Killing a lot of insects and rodents when plowing/tilling land to grow sugarcane/corn(sirup).

Why discount one but not the other if they are equal?

I came here for rpg, not :.|:;

Oh yeah. I thought you meant how they are used culturally. Because we have many nok-berries with berry in their name.

Berries, insects

Damn autocorrect striking again.