What point do you think you are making? You may need to reread the comment chain.
What point do you think you are making? You may need to reread the comment chain.
Policies based on their feelings instead of facts.
No sources, eh? Let me help: At least 12 civilians were killed and 2800 people injured by pager bombs. Hezbollah reported 11 members died that day.
Can you explain why you are making up stats with no source?
The exchanges get hacked. Passwords are encrypted but not contact info and current balances are not. American exchanges are forced to collect accurate KYC info for every customer.
You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you’ve now countered: “why would hezbollah report that?”.
We don’t know; it’s your premise. Where did you get that stat?
Of course. But their target audience will not consider that for a moment.
In the same speech in Wisconsin, Standifer described the strategy to train Christians as election workers as “a Trojan horse.”
What are you disputing? You can dispute inaccurate or fraudulent marks on your credit.
That’s awesome! Just wanted to get you to take a second look in case you were as diligent as my friend but it sounds like you’re right, then!
You sure about that? I have a friend who thought that too but found out 7 years later that only a bankruptcy will disappear after 7 years, not just idle delinquint accounts. He needed to actually file for bankrupcy to make it go away. This was in Usa, NY; maybe it’s different other places.
As a second “data” point: I have some accounts on my credit report that have not been touched in a decade+ yet they are still there (they are not delinquent).
Usenet? Most new media can be found there. The most copyright-contentious files are not on there for long so most folks use automated downloaders.
We’ve already solved this issue without biometrics. The manufacturers just cheaped out on actually implementing it in the affected models.
Look for the guy with a burnt cock.
What do you mean? I never really see much about RFKjr but I don’t have him tagged as a topic of interest.
I’m not sure because I live in the US but the feed is based on “tags” you select. It seems like they process stories from around the world but I don’t have a grasp on how comprehensive they are, internationally.
I’m not familiar with MBFC. It may be similar but I don’t mind throwing some $$ at any project making these efforts. What I like about Ground News is that all the sources for a given story are aggregated to one page, sorted based on political bias, and rated on accuracy. That information combined with the “Blindspot” feature (which highlights when a story is disproportionately covered more by one side) is very powerful IMO. It looks like the blindspot feed it’s available to non-subscribers but doesn’t include the political bias of the source: https://ground.news/blindspot
Ground News. The blind spot feature gives me great insight to where my “out of touch” family is coming from with their political narratives.
Economists at Harvard studied a four year period and concluded the IRS gains $4.25 for every $1 spent on auditing wealthiest tax payers.
I wonder if the IRS can immediately recover funds with a magic wand or if it’s a protracted, investigative process.
https://www.businessinsider.com/irs-tax-audits-recover-12-dollars-for-every-dollar-spent-2023-6
You want evidence?? Are you some kind of antisemite?? /s