We can keep them indefinitely then, right? If they’re not doing anything there is no need to ever revoke them.
We can keep them indefinitely then, right? If they’re not doing anything there is no need to ever revoke them.
“Variedades de español”
During much of its history, and especially during the Francoist dictatorship (1939–1975), the Catalan language was ridiculed as a mere dialect of Spanish.[60][61] This view, based on political and ideological considerations, has no linguistic validity.[60][61]
<.<
Well, there’s only finitely many atoms in the universe, do all algorithms therefore have constant time?
Although you could argue for very large amounts of clothes my method of throwing clothes on the floor starts performing worse due to clothes falling on the same spot and piling up again.
Unless you extend your room. Let’s take a look at the ✨amortized✨time complexity.
Thay depends on the size of the pile, there could be a lot of weight and instability above the pants and you’ll have to pull them out à la Jenga or carefully rearrange the stack.
Since the amount of rearranging increases for larger n (imagine a pile reaching the ceiling), searching is in ω(1).
Ok, I didn’t understand roughly half of your comment because I don’t actually know how cache works in practice
BUT
a messy pile of clothes represents a stack, doesn’t it? And a stack makes a horrible cache because unlike a simple array you don’t have fast random access. You’d have to dig through the entire pile of clothes to get to the bottom which takes a lot of time.
Why would you use a pile out of all data structures, only adding is in ϴ(1), searching is in ϴ(n).
I suggest throwing the clothes on the floor and remembering the spot they landed on. That’s ϴ(1) for adding and for searching, far superior to a stack of clothes on a chair.
Side note: fuck big O notation, use big ϴ notation >:(
Not necessarily, there’s regional languages such as Catalan. The phrase is kinda iffy considering what Spanish nationalists think of those languages.
The EU plans to do so and as such every member must follow it.
And once encryption is criminalized, it can be trivially detected - or at least assumed to be encrypted if your message is sufficiently random.