• Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are you talking about those motherfuckers that turn a little to the opposite direction before turning? I fucking HATE that shit.

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      uhm that’s counter steering and actually helps you reach the apex of the corner quicker.
      rookie racer

      • ebc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The motherfuckers who do this take said turn at like 2km/h, they’re not racing at all

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If they are traveling in the right direction they can actually take the turn in upwards of 1672 km/h in your example

    • marzhall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The good news: I don’t drive anymore

      The bad news: I did that shit because I grew up on an intersection with a real bad angle, so the only way to see both directions was to angle the car flat with the road I was turning onto. Then, even after moving, I did it because it gives better visibility.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We might be talking about something different, or maybe I’m just having difficulty understanding. You at least have a good reason for doing what you did. What I was mentioning is when people turn to the opposite direction of their actual turn, because they think they need more room to clear the sidewalk corner. The solution to this is to simply pull FORWARD a little more before your turn. It’s NEVER a good idea to move unpredictably on the road, and that action is a prime example.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It because they’re bracing themselves with the steering wheel when doing a very exaggerated shoulder check.
      My driver training course explicitly brought this up, but presumably not everyone took driver training.

      But I don’t think that’s what they’re talking about, I think they mean that little cars who give an enormous berth between their car and obstacles, so they end up taking up as much of the road as a large car would

      • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You are correct that’s what I mean. Little cars passing parked cars, rubbish on the road, or bicyclists in the bike lane going half way, or more, into the oncoming lane to avoid it.

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It only takes one bike to wobble as you pass or one baby cart coming unexpectedly out behind the obstacle to imprint the need to give wide clearance

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Quickest line and far easier to not hit those rims. You might not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.